@article{oai:rissho.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004071,
 author = {市村, 祐樹 and ICHIMURA, Yuki and 井田, 政則 and IDA, Masanori},
 journal = {立正大学心理学研究年報},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {How we believe that intelligence is? Can intelligence be changed by effort? Is intelligence determined by nature? We
have a belief that intelligence varies from person to person. Dweck defines such a belief as Implicit Theories of Intelligence（
ITI）. There are two theories in ITI. Those are incremental theory and entity theory. Incremental theory is a belief
that I can change my intelligence. Entity theory is a belief that my intelligence can’t control by myself. Many past
researches treat ITI as one factor. But recent researches treat ITI as two factors. Purposes of this study is to verify for
reliability and validity about a two-factor Implicit Theories of Intelligence scale. Hierarchical factor analysis showed that
ITI are stabled by one factor or two factors. But two-factor model is better than one factor model, because all two factor
model’s paths are significant. And correlational analysis showed that different patterns of convergent validity. These
results mean that incremental theory and entity theory has different quality. Results of two analysis means that two-factor
implicit theories of intelligence scale is better than past one factor scale.},
 pages = {31--36},
 title = {２因子暗黙の知能観尺度の信頼性・妥当性},
 volume = {10},
 year = {2019}
}