WEKO3
アイテム
BIS/BAS が意思決定フレーミング効果に及ぼす影響
https://doi.org/10.34386/00007733
https://doi.org/10.34386/000077330985b0eb-5cf8-4ab6-aecb-20d2f39fd323
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2020-10-02 | |||||||||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||||||||
タイトル | BIS/BAS が意思決定フレーミング効果に及ぼす影響 | |||||||||||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||||||||
タイトル | Influence of BIS/BAS on framing effect in decision-making | |||||||||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||||||||
言語 | ||||||||||||||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||||||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||||||||
主題 | framing effect(en), decision-making(en), behavioral activation system(en), behavioral inhibition system(en), BIS/BAS Scales(en), logistic regression analysis(en) | |||||||||||||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||||||||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||||||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||||||||
ID登録 | ||||||||||||||||||
ID登録 | 10.34386/00007733 | |||||||||||||||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||||||||||
アクセス権 | ||||||||||||||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||||||||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||||||||||
著者 |
井田, 政則
× 井田, 政則
× 小橋, 眞理子
|
|||||||||||||||||
抄録 | ||||||||||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||||||||
内容記述 | This study aims to examine the influence of the Behavioral Inhibition System(BIS)and the Behavioral Activation System(BAS)on framing effect in decision-making. The experiment participants included 293 students from a private university in Tokyo. They responded to the Japanese Version of BIS/BAS Scales (Takahashi et al.,2007)and answered two framing questions. These framing questions included the Asian disease problem(Tversky & Kahneman, 1981)and the monetary gamble problem(Kahneman, 2001), with each being composed of positive framing conditions and negative framing conditions, giving a total of four problems. There were two choices for each condition, and these choices were semantically equivalent, were different for each frame, and consisted of risk aversion and risk taking. The participants chose one option out of the two. For analysis, a logistic regression analysis was conducted with risk aversion, risk taking, and preference reversal as the response variables and the four factors of BIS, BAS(drive), BAS (reward responsiveness), and BAS(fun seeking)as the explanatory variables. As a result, the following items were identified:( 1)in the positive frame conditions, risk taking was observed the higher the BAS (drive),( 2)in the negative frame conditions, risk taking was observed the lower the BIS,( 3)in preference reversal, in the Asian disease problem, preference reversal occurred the lower the BAS(drive), and in the monetary gamble problem, preference reversal occurred the lower the BIS. The above results were discussed based on prospect theory. |
|||||||||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||||||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 立正大学心理学研究年報 en : The Journal of Psychology Rissho University 巻 11, p. 1-12, 発行日 2020-03-31 |
|||||||||||||||||
ISSN | ||||||||||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||||||||||
収録物識別子 | 21851069 | |||||||||||||||||
出版タイプ | ||||||||||||||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||||||||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||||||||||
出版者 | ||||||||||||||||||
出版者 | 立正大学心理学部 | |||||||||||||||||
言語 | ja |